• @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Click through the images…it’s a slideshow with information on each one lol.

    Oh, how about that. So, that slideshow only quotes the same “expert” as the fox news did.

    Here are links to the actual legislation:

    You’re relying on one bigoted alarmist’s deliberate misinterpretation of the law.

    • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      The law specifically puts “gender identity” as a protected class for this legislation. Why do you think that is?

          • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It means they’re protected by the law. Not this sky-is-falling nonsense from one guy whose job it is to scream sky-is-falling nonsense.

            • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…….which is the point that you guys are saying isn’t true.

              • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…

                According to one guy who is deliberately misinterpreting the law because he’s a bigoted alarmist who doesn’t want trans people having any legal protections at all. You keep ignoring this.

                • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I’m sure you don’t even see the irony in saying that’s just one persons opinion of it, like a random staunch democrat voters opinion isn’t biased in one direction.

                  What you mean to say is that you disagree and think the law won’t be enforced that way. The law makes it possible to enforce misgendering as hate speech.