@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world • 2 months agoThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1380file-textcross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1380external-linkThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.com@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square194fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: science@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppetlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoConsider virtually every other sporting example in the history of sports that require speed, strength, and endurance for more examples.
minus-square@jpreston2005@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•2 months agothe article you didn’t read goes into that, and ultra marathons show parity between the sexes.
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppetlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoThere’s also this: https://lemmy.world/comment/12209418 The fact that women perform at parity in ultra marathons doesn’t invalidate the very obvious differences in speed, strength, and stamina between biological males and females. Muscle and bone density alone account for a lot of that.
Consider virtually every other sporting example in the history of sports that require speed, strength, and endurance for more examples.
the article you didn’t read goes into that, and ultra marathons show parity between the sexes.
There’s also this:
https://lemmy.world/comment/12209418
The fact that women perform at parity in ultra marathons doesn’t invalidate the very obvious differences in speed, strength, and stamina between biological males and females. Muscle and bone density alone account for a lot of that.