• sunzu2
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    this way of thinking assumes that having “muhh team” win will result any change, when historical record shows that the two party system has degraded quality of life for most people over last 40 years with no end in sight.

    but sure keep voting for your team lol we can revisit this topic when we are all living hand to mouth and have even less economic power

    • @roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      272 months ago

      That is not at all what the comment you replied to meant. Anyone with reading comprehension would know that.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          332 months ago

          Splitting the vote allows an opening for fascists to take control with a minority of support, like they do.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            ahh yes… muhh team right, vote for my guy, trust me bro 🤡

            Anyway, the two party regime is the same guy, y’all can keep doing these mental gymnastics but people are taking notice. why keep doing the same thing and expect different result?

            You can keep voting for your “guy” while some will vote third party as protest vote to deny the regime legitimacy.

            • @ochi_chernye@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              182 months ago

              Can you see that you’re arguing against fictitious strawmen? You seem to be operating under the delusion that for all the dumb normies who have “bought into” the existing two-party system, politics is just a game that they play without understanding. You’ve reduced them all to NPC’s who lack the capacity to reason; obviously their only motivation could be mindless conformity to their “team”.

              Is it your contention that it doesn’t matter what party controls the branches of government, because they’re both the same? While this is factually inaccurate, it would at least be in line with the actions you’re advocating. Speaking of which, how exactly do you imagine a “protest” vote would deny the subsequently elected government legitimacy? What force and effect do you foresee that action producing? Because anyone with a working knowledge of our electoral system can tell you that the only discernable result will be the empowerment of the minority party, which in this case seeks a fascist overthrow of our democratic system.

              What you’re doing here is applying shallow, childish logic to a complex and nuanced problem, while pretending to have some high-minded motivations which—if they exist at all—clearly haven’t been thought through.

              • sunzu2
                link
                fedilink
                42 months ago

                You are shilling for the status quo. I reject the status quo.

                People can make their own decisions.

                • YeetPics
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 months ago

                  Yea well I rejected the status quo before it was cool.

                  You’re just another bandwagon status-quo hater.

                  • sunzu2
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 months ago

                    You’re just another bandwagon status-quo hater.

                    Based on the spazzing around this here thread… clearly not