• @1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It’s my experience that Ubuntu and Fedora break if you don’t upgrade often (and then suddenly do after a year), while arch doesn’t… Which is interesting, since it’s supposed to be the other way around…

    I think it’s because Fedora and Ubuntu add a lot of new things, while arch just updates it’s packages.

    • bitwolf
      link
      26 hours ago

      Fedora upgrades are very reliable. I’ve never had one fail, 24 upgrades and counting.

    • @Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      412 hours ago

      More please. Getting ready to switch from Windows to Linux, been making sure I can install all the -arr I want and get games running, but in Mint.

      Now I’m hitting the brakes hard. It’s Arch if that means I don’t have this headache. I’ll need to start over learning, but it’ll be worth it.

      • @DesolateMood@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        310 hours ago

        As long as you update frequently (I do it whenever I think about it, usually once every few days to a week) you shouldn’t run into any issues

      • @punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 hours ago

        I’ve had two different arch based distros have issues when trying to update after long periods. I also had an Ubuntu server fail completely when doing a major version upgrade and had to restore it from backup. But then again I’ve also had no trouble updating an Ubuntu machine that was a couple years behind.

        I’m on Fedora now for my desktop and it’s been great so far, but I also do updates at least weekly. My advice would be if you expect to go months between updates your best choice is probably Debian.