• MasterOBee Master/King
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      do you actually argue why abortion should be legal or illegal.

      Because that’s not my argument, that’s what you want to argue.

      I’m simply stating that almost every single other western country, even ones that are much more liberal than the U.S., has laws restricting abortions in the scenario that this woman had an abortion. If the U.S. is a shithole 3rd world country because of this, those nations surely are as well.

      Nebraska’s abortion policy at this time was more liberal than europes, who we offten compare our policies to.

      I’m also arguing that just because you think a policy would be good, doesn’t make it ‘right’ for the other 7 billion people in the world.

      • @hotdaniel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        You’re arguing that you don’t have to argue. You’re the same guy I’m replying to from yesterday about this very topic. I’m laughing so hard that here you are spending all your energy taking about what most western countries do or do not do, but you STILL won’t argue for or against bodily autonomy, for or against abortion. You have no argument! You just want to talk about things that are completely irrelevant, like what policy has been decided. It’s irrelevant! Argue or admit you can’t justify what you believe. This is my 3rd reply to you and you never argue or justify anything, just more invitation to meaningless conversation.

        • MasterOBee Master/King
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          You’re arguing that you don’t have to argue.

          My argument is that our abortion policies tend to be in line, or more liberal than many of the western countries the left looks up to.

          I’d be fine with a 12 week ban, that’s in much of western europe.

          • @hotdaniel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            I don’t care! This is exactly what I meant about conservative misdirection when YOU were CRYING yesterday about how everyone ridicules conservatives on reddit/lemmy. Ridiculous ideas deserve ridicule, by definition. You refuse to engage my argument because you have no response. So you argue ANYTHING else, you ask me to consider your own arguments, knowing you’ll trap and misdirect at every turn. Abortion should be legal because we should have a right to our own bodies. Ultimately, you don’t believe in this right, which is why you avoid the topic. If you want to know why I treat you like other conservatives, it’s because you act like other conservatives.

            • @Thekingoflorda@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Please keep this discussion civil, per rule 1. Don’t personally attack people who don’t agree with you. Go to twitter if you want to do that.

              • @hotdaniel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                I don’t see how I’m personally attacking them, nor do I intend to. When I said they were crying, I was referencing their comment from yesterday. I want to attack their ideas, which do not need to be respected. I respect their right to have their opinion heard and that’s why I’ve repeatedly asked this user to argue the topic, as of yesterday. They will not. They also complained that they were unfairly persecuted, while they respond to threads like this one, asserting their opinion, arguing irrelevant topics, never engaging my position. I’d call them a troll but I think they’re sincere.