• @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The problem is that if it was fail open, any Tesla left standing around long enough for the battery to drain would unlock.

    The door needs to be mechanical. Everyone else is mechanical with a sensor to auto lower the window on frameless car door windows.

    Tesla did the cost analysis and decided the lawsuits from a few deaths were less than the profit to be made by not making safe doors.

    • @Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 days ago

      Ah! I kept wondering how the fuck opening the door can damage the window. The doors don’t have window frames. That has always been a shitty design.

    • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 days ago

      Tesla did the cost analysis and decided the lawsuits from a few deaths were less than the profit to be made by not making safe doors.

      I think it’s much worse than that - I think it’s just because they (well, Musk) thought it would be “cool” to have everything automatic and just ignored or pushed aside any safety arguments.

      • @toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        Not defending the decision. I think it’s bad design.

        That said, supposedly the reason is that the doorframes do not run along the top of the window, allegedly to reduce the weight of the car. Because of this, the window itself has to form the seal, which could potentially damage the window if the door is mechanically opened. The electronic button lowers the window as it opens the door in order to reduce the risk.

        Again, I don’t support this reasoning. I’m just sharing it.

        • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 days ago

          Ahh - yeah I think you’re right. I remember somebody complaining about damaging their car when they had to open it manually. What a bad design.