@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoThe science is clear. So why can’t governments agree on vaping?www.politico.euexternal-linkmessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up1213
arrow-up1213external-linkThe science is clear. So why can’t governments agree on vaping?www.politico.eu@YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square210fedilink
minus-square@ChexMax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•1 year agosecond and third-hand smoke and vaping aerosols contain harmful, toxic and cancer-causing chemicals that can be breathed in.
minus-square@mindbleach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoYou’re why enforced civility is a fucking nightmare to deal with. ‘This doesn’t affect you!’ It does. ‘Well make it don’t.’
minus-squarePenguinJuicelinkfedilink3•11 months agoThat doesn’t invalidate my point. Yes, if someone is vaping somewhere inappropriate, that’s not right. But if they are outside, that’s really fucked that you think you get to dictate what other people do outside. It’s their world too.
minus-square@LexiconDrexicon@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•11 months agoSo you want the freedom to attack people minding their own business?
second and third-hand smoke and vaping aerosols contain harmful, toxic and cancer-causing chemicals that can be breathed in.
Then don’t stand near them?
You’re why enforced civility is a fucking nightmare to deal with.
‘This doesn’t affect you!’ It does. ‘Well make it don’t.’
That doesn’t invalidate my point. Yes, if someone is vaping somewhere inappropriate, that’s not right. But if they are outside, that’s really fucked that you think you get to dictate what other people do outside. It’s their world too.
So you want the freedom to attack people minding their own business?