• @beefcat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s funny how people on this site want creatives to get paid but also think their work should be handed out for free.

    These people live off residuals. It’s a big sticking point in the ongoing WGA and SAG strikes.

    • @pory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Ah yes, residuals, famously something that streaming services provide. Paying for a sub service isn’t supporting creators, it’s exclusively supporting an army of middlemen and marketers. If you want to support creatives, buy physical media (I own some blu rays even though no device in my home is capable of playing them) or merchandise.

    • DosDude👾
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I think the biggest problem is fragmentation. Piracy is a service problem. Before all streaming split from Netflix I barely pirated anymore. Now it’s the most convenient option.

      • @beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The problem there is you probably don’t want Netflix to be $90/mo. In order for every thing to be on one service, either the amount of content needs to go way down or the price needs to go way up.

        This stuff is expensive to make, and it will get more so once the strikes are over and writers and actors start actually getting compensated fairly for content made for streaming.

        • DosDude👾
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Convenience means more subscribers means more money coming in. Your rationale of 90 dollars overvalued. Just look at the music business these days. Or ebooks/audiobooks for that matter. There’s no other reason to make everything exclusive to one streaming site other than greed.

          Take a page from the games industry. Make new shit exclusive on your platform and then rake in the money via all streaming sites. The same way syndication works in the old days.