• @theragu40@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    141
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I really love this web comic. I’m very unsure how it will translate to anything beyond its current scope, which is essentially translation of individual “moments” into literal language. The shtick doesn’t have a chance to get old when it’s never a situation longer than like 6 panels. But I’m curious enough to be mildly interested.

    And by all means, good for Nathan Pyle for cashing in on this. That’s awesome.

    • Deconceptualist
      link
      fedilink
      54
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yep, agreed with all that.

      It’s definitely weird hearing the blue guys’ lines coming from modern over-enthusiastic voice actors. In my mind I guess I always imagined them talking like Coneheads or robotic munchkins of some sort.

      I thought the point was to laugh at the world from an Asperger’s-y perspective pushed out to absurdity, because when you step back for a second our human habits and rituals really are goddamn bizarre. So hearing those observations not in some calculated alien monotone but rather fully dynamic cartoon pitches feels somehow jarring to me. Maybe I’ll get over it though.

      But yeah. Congrats to Nathan for sure. Tiny trash! 🎉

      • @relevants@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        1111 months ago

        Well, I think Dan Harmon being involved means it probably has at least a little bit of that absurdity still.

      • @ghostBones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Well, it worked for 3rd Rock from the Sun. I see it as the outsider perspective which can be a plentiful source of material.

    • topher
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      Seconded. This comic is a real gem. I’m glad to see it’s author do well from it, but I’m uncertain I would consume a Rick and Morty-style episodic instalment of moving pictures of it.

      On that note, I’m not even certain the playfully literal language style of the comic can be sustained for 20-30 minutes straight, without getting old. I hope it can - in a similar vain it worked for the movie Home (though I’ve never read the Smekday book to know if that was invented by DreamWorks for the movie, or came over from the page)

    • Deconceptualist
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yep, agreed with all that.

      It’s definitely weird hearing the blue guys’ lines coming from modern over-enthusiastic voice actors. In my mind I guess I always imagined them talking like Coneheads or robotic munchkins of some sort.

      I thought the point was to laugh at the world from an Asperger’s-y perspective pushed out to absurdity, because when you step back for a second our human habits and rituals really are goddamn bizarre. So hearing those observations not in some calculated alien monotone but rather fully dynamic cartoon intonations feels somehow jarring to me. Maybe I’ll get over it though.

      But yeah. Congrats to Nathan for sure. Tiny trash! 🎉

  • @Lakija@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    48
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The language is not verbose enough. That’s the whole point. And the voices don’t match the vibe of the comics.

    Hopefully it turns out to be alright. Edit: on second viewing it’s not so bad. It’s kind of cute. But I’m cautious. Tiny trash 🎉

    • @EliasChao
      link
      1411 months ago

      And the voices don’t match the vibe of the comics

      This one’s a bit tricky since many people would have different interpretations of it.

      • @Lakija@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2411 months ago

        It seems like we all were angling toward a more serene, robotic or alien voice. Something more neutral.

        I found that interesting from reading the comments so far.

  • JBloodthorn
    link
    fedilink
    4311 months ago

    These are not the calm and soothing voices that I read those comics in my head with.

    Looks cute though.

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    3211 months ago

    I trust Dan Harmon to do something interesting at the least, but man, this really doesn’t match up with the spirit of the original strips, at least in my view. Maybe this is what the creator saw all along.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1711 months ago

      For me it’s mostly the music and the narrator that ruins the vibe of the strips. It also makes me wonder if the many recent appearances of this strip on Lemmy is part of an astroturf campaign to support this show.

      • @lukenamop@lemmy.world
        cake
        M
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Nah, I’m the creator of this community and the person who’s been prolifically posting the comic, I’m not affiliated with Nathan in any way, just a fan of the comics.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          That is what an astroturfer would say!

          Keep posting 'em, they are funny.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Tbf, that’s all super generic trailer stuff, so I don’t really attribute it to the show. Being that generic isn’t a particularly great sign, though.

    • @EliasChao
      link
      1411 months ago

      Or the creator received an offer they wouldn’t be able to reject.

  • Madbrad200
    link
    fedilink
    28
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    meh, has that “quirky animated comedy” vibe. Doesn’t match the aesthetic of the comic much. feels like just another generic animation that they had in the pipeline and they’ve just slapped some branding of a known comic ontop.

    • 2fat4that
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      I agree. I feel like the obvious choice would have been these Aliens come to earth to observe our strange habits and, in the end, gives us a unique perspective of ourselves.

  • @Stoneykins
    link
    2111 months ago

    I love the comic strip and am looking forward to this.

    But apple tv? That sucks. For them, mostly, I’m just gunna have to pirate it.

    • TheRealKuni
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but Apple TV is not a bad offering as streaming services go. $7/month and plenty of good shows, including Ted Lasso (one of my favorite shows of all time), Mythic Quest (made by most of the Always Sunny team), Shrinking (starring Harrison Ford and Jason Segal), Schmigadoon (musical-spoof that’s really fun), and more.

      My biggest complaint with it is that there isn’t an Android phone/tablet app, but you can watch it in-browser on Android devices. Otherwise it’s available everywhere (including Android TVs). You don’t need any Apple devices to use the streaming service.

      • @TheSambassador@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        The browser version seems deliberately bad. They didn’t even have a search bar until this year. The shows are good, but the non apple interface is pretty awful.

      • @Stoneykins
        link
        711 months ago

        I don’t like the company in general, so I don’t want to support them. You aren’t a corporate shill for not sharing that opinion, but I really don’t want to support them unless I think it is unreasonable to avoid doing so.

        While it is “available” on non-apple devices, I’ve heard almost exclusively negative things about how it runs on the devices I do most of my watching.

        Apple tv content is some of the easiest to illegally access content around. Almost no work and $0 is better than $7.

        I don’t subscribe to anything I don’t already know for certain I’ll like anyways, I have trouble trusting reviews and other peoples opinions on media. I’ll watch on a friends account or something first, or not at all. Streaming services that don’t have a free with ads tier are not something I really approve of, it feels like buying a mystery.

        • TheRealKuni
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Fair enough! Pirate Ted Lasso if you haven’t yet, it’s amazing!

    • @beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s one of the cheapest and most consistent streaming services.

      Just do what most people do and rotate something else out for a month or two so you can support the people who make this stuff. Writers don’t get residuals from piracy. And popularity on torrent sites doesn’t help them win renewals or better contracts.

      • @Stoneykins
        link
        311 months ago

        If a show that I watched illegally is really good I make an effort to purchase stuff directly from the writers, or occasionally just give them a donation. Its not like the majority of a subscription would go to them either, just mostly in a CEOs pocket.

        I could afford the extra subscription, it isn’t just about shaving down costs. I have a very good “user experience”, better than most streaming services I’ve used, when I pirate things. I don’t have any apple devices to watch on, and have heard it is unpleasant to use apple tv on alternatives.

        Lastly, I just don’t like apple. Thats just my opinion, I don’t wanna support them.

        • @LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          The writers aren’t the only people that work on a show. Buying something “directly from the writers” may sound or feel like it’s an altruistic move, but those credits at the end of a show with hundreds of names represent all the people who won’t get paid by you buying something “directly from the writers”.

          Also, paying for things is how things continue to get made. If Apple looks at the streaming numbers for something like Strange Planet and they’re very low, there’s no season 2. All the crew on the show may find other work, but similar concepts may be labeled as “unprofitable”, and the market for ideas like “here’s a quirky web comic that we all love, let’s try making it into a show” hurts for it.

          A sliver of what you would pay for Apple TV+ would go towards Tim Cook, sure, but the guy is actually paid a significantly smaller slice of the profits of Apple than many other CEOs are paid by their respective companies, and the pie of an Apple TV plus subscription isn’t divided up to only one or two people.

          • @Stoneykins
            link
            111 months ago

            It isn’t my job personally to worry about the employees of a massive corperation with more money at any given time than I’ll ever see.

            I pay the artists writers sometimes not because I think they are owed something for their work, but because I want to reward well done art that I liked. It isn’t how I convince myself that piracy of media produced by large corperations is moral, I think piracy of media produced by large corperations is always moral because large corperations are inherently predatory on all public commons, especially when it comes to IP law. Just look at how they took away the entire concept of things entering the public domain from entire generations.

      • @pory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        This guy thinks people that know how to download TV shows have “other subscriptions to rotate out”

        • @beefcat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s funny how people on this site want creatives to get paid but also think their work should be handed out for free.

          These people live off residuals. It’s a big sticking point in the ongoing WGA and SAG strikes.

          • DosDude👾
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            I think the biggest problem is fragmentation. Piracy is a service problem. Before all streaming split from Netflix I barely pirated anymore. Now it’s the most convenient option.

            • @beefcat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The problem there is you probably don’t want Netflix to be $90/mo. In order for every thing to be on one service, either the amount of content needs to go way down or the price needs to go way up.

              This stuff is expensive to make, and it will get more so once the strikes are over and writers and actors start actually getting compensated fairly for content made for streaming.

              • DosDude👾
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Convenience means more subscribers means more money coming in. Your rationale of 90 dollars overvalued. Just look at the music business these days. Or ebooks/audiobooks for that matter. There’s no other reason to make everything exclusive to one streaming site other than greed.

                Take a page from the games industry. Make new shit exclusive on your platform and then rake in the money via all streaming sites. The same way syndication works in the old days.

          • @pory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Ah yes, residuals, famously something that streaming services provide. Paying for a sub service isn’t supporting creators, it’s exclusively supporting an army of middlemen and marketers. If you want to support creatives, buy physical media (I own some blu rays even though no device in my home is capable of playing them) or merchandise.

    • Mewtwo
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I saw the artist at SDCC this year, so glad they are becoming so popular.

  • @monkeyman512@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1711 months ago

    I don’t know if I will like this show, but I am happy if the comic creator got a bunch of money from it being made.

  • @Jase@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    I’m weirded out by you people saying that you pictured the comics in a calm voice. They are pretty clearly anything but. They get happy and exuberant over every tiny thing, taking joy in all the small moments. Reading it in a calm voice really seems to miss the point of the comic…

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      I read it as calm and clinical observation of small absurdities in human behavior, which made it funnier than if it was aliens being excited about things.

      • @Jase@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Yes. I’m aware as everyone has spent the thread literally saying that, which is why I made my comment. Thanks for the repeated input.

          • @Jase@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Again, thank you for the utterly worthless engagement here. Clearly the dregs of reddit jumped over here too.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              I’m weirded out by you people saying that you pictured the this post in a calm voice. It is pretty clearly anything but. Jase gets happy and exuberant over every tiny thing, taking joy in all the small moments. Reading it in a calm voice really seems to miss the point of the post…

    • @mycatiskai
      link
      1611 months ago

      It will be out on the high seas within hours of release if that helps.

        • @mycatiskai
          link
          311 months ago

          I usually give it an hour or two because within the first hour people have downloaded it and watched the video and if there are issues there will be a repack version with sound and video issues fixed.

    • TheRealKuni
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Apple TV doesn’t require an Apple device, in case you weren’t aware. I made this mistake myself a few years ago when I wanted to watch Ted Lasso. They don’t have an Android phone/tablet app, though you can watch in a browser on those devices. It works everywhere else.