@WackyTabbacy42069@reddthat.comcake to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 11 months agoWhat language do you find the most seductive, and what about it makes you feel that way?message-square86fedilinkarrow-up176
arrow-up176message-squareWhat language do you find the most seductive, and what about it makes you feel that way?@WackyTabbacy42069@reddthat.comcake to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 11 months agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-square@thepiguy@lemmy.mllinkfedilink57•11 months agoMy dumass thought op meant programming language, and I spent 2 minutes thinking of some sarcastic reply.
minus-squareJakyllalinkfedilink21•edit-211 months ago++++++++++[>++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++++>+++<<<<-] >-.>-.--------.+++++++.-------.>----..<.>>++.<<-.>+.>.<<++.>---.---.--.<-----.++++++.--.
minus-square@CoderKat@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-211 months agoI know it’s wrong, but there’s something about the forbiddenness of JS that makes it sexy. Oh, baby, you wanna do what with my strings? Jokes aside, Scala or Haskell, hands down. Those are sexy languages that make gorgeous code.
minus-square@dunz@feddit.nulinkfedilink16•11 months agoThis won’t work, and it’s called C++, and that’s C, not C++.
minus-squarezero_iqlinkfedilink5•edit-211 months agoWell, actually, [no it isn’t].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B) There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn’t work in C, but there’s also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn’t valid C++.
My dumass thought op meant programming language, and I spent 2 minutes thinking of some sarcastic reply.
++++++++++[>++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++++>+++<<<<-] >-.>-.--------.+++++++.-------.>----..<.>>++.<<-.>+.>.<<++.>---.---.--.<-----.++++++.--.I know it’s wrong, but there’s something about the forbiddenness of JS that makes it sexy.
Oh, baby, you wanna do what with my strings?
Jokes aside, Scala or Haskell, hands down. Those are sexy languages that make gorgeous code.
Printf(hello);
Ladies go crazy with C.
This won’t work, and it’s called C++, and that’s C, not C++.
C is C++
Well, actually, [no it isn’t].(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B)
There are obviously lots of things in C++ that doesn’t work in C, but there’s also lots of stuff in C, especially from 1999 onwards, that isn’t valid C++.
Good to know. Thanks