• @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    Their invasive tactics are concerning. If we’d eat that, other devs may follow. It may become the new reality.

    Servers aren’t free. Donating to your instance is better than paying forban add-free Sync experience. This way you also help other users by making downtime even less noticeable.

    • @moriquende@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Nothing is free. If you value the app and don’t like ads, pay for it. If not, use a free one or build one yourself. If you value the service a server is providing, pay for it. Why would you want to artificially restrict our possibilities? it’s not like we can only choose one or the other.

      • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        It may snowball into other apps wanting it too? The first to take this step out of blue is asking to face some resistance. It’s natural. I’m surprised no one else is against them.

        • @moriquende@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          So? Someone who can’t afford to build an app for free won’t do it if there is no demand for it. People building free open source apps will still do it. I really don’t get the problem…

          • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Other free services becoming for-profits and add-infested? Sync can set a trend others may follow. As they are first to do so, I’m surprised no one argues thst, as they may set up a degradation of every others’ experience with this platform.

            • @moriquende@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              So is your argument that devs creating free apps are only doing so because they haven’t realized they could be charging money for it? Because if so, you live in another world than the rest of us, friend.