Season 1s are great, setup, some payoff, a bit of lead into the overarching story. Then season 2 to X. The heroes win and then lose in the final episode, cliffhanger to next season. People get bored. Final season is announced and they wrap up the show.

  • freamon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7711 months ago

    It can certainly seem that way sometimes. Shows like The Handmaid’s Tale have been circling the drain of their own premise for a few years now. A big part of it, I think, is that they want to keep their main cast for as long as possible, which limits the options of what can happen.

    Give me a mini-series, or even an anthology series, any day.

    • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3011 months ago

      I love the limited scope of British TV series. They even managed to do only a few seasons of Law & Order, for crying out loud.

          • Very_Bad_Janet
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            Look at Black Mirror. The British seasons are some of the best TV ever made. The American (Netflix) seasons have often been meh or downright awful, and derivative of the original seasons.

        • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          811 months ago

          I think it’s for the best. Too much money in the US is spent on bullshit.

          In any case, US versions of British series are almost certainly worse.

          • @fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Couldn’t agree more. The final season was such nonsense it soured the whole show and I’ve never bothered to watch it through again (ignoring the incessant “tell not show” with being told how brilliant Sherlock is but never really showing that, and how the mysteries were never deductible by the audience).

    • @legion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Shows like The Handmaid’s Tale have been circling the drain of their own premise for a few years now.

      As far as I’m concerned, that show ended when the first season did (which corresponded with the ending of the book).

      When I heard a season 2 was happening, I thought it might be based around the book’s epilogue. Instead, it’s the same story dragged out long past where it was supposed to end.

    • Throwaway
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I still don’t get why so many were relating handmaids tale to real life. Just as annoying as those who think everything is 1984. Its a YA series, and not a particularly great one at that.

      • SanguinePar
        link
        fedilink
        2911 months ago

        Not sure about the show, but Margaret Atwood has been at pains to point out that pretty much everything in her books has a real life precedent (albeit in different places at different times).

      • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1611 months ago

        Do you really not see the parallels to real life of a religiously-ruled country who has enshrined in law ways to take control of fertile women’s reproductive rights? Really?

        The US is becoming more and more Giléad with every passing day.

        • Throwaway
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          I don’t see anyone taking away rights of women, and America is secular.

          You can draw parallels between anything, thats not really pertinent.

          • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1111 months ago

            Do ya remember Roe vs. Wade or the recent decision that overturned it, thus removing the rights of a woman to decide whether or not she will continue a pregnancy?

            • Throwaway
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Judges should not make laws, congress should. Roe v Wade was a bad judgement. Also congress had decades to make it a law, and they failed to do so.

              • @richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1011 months ago

                You’re using purist arguments to deny what’s evident. Your account name should have been a clue that you’re a troll. Goodbye.

              • @kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                211 months ago

                You’re getting downvotes, but everything you said was correct. Congress should have made the ruling more than that, and Dems had years to make actual laws to uphold what Roe represented.

                However, Republican opinion is specifically what eroded the opinion that upheld Roe v Wade, and Republicans get to hold the blame for what many women in many states now have to live with.