• Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      801 year ago

      It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Guess we shouldn’t have any laws about anything, then.

      • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        661 year ago

        Bit of a leap, my dude.

        Of course we should have laws.

        But for things that are actually harmful.

        For everything else we should have regulation.

        • Ech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          If your single point is “trying to stop people only makes them do it more”, than no, it’s not a “leap”. That invalidates the very idea of having laws in the first place.

          And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

          • Orphie Baby
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We didn’t say this about everything (although it is true that some kinds of people are attracted to anything forbidden). We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

              I don’t see any such qualifiers. Do you?

              • Orphie Baby
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Semi-Hemi-Demigod said:

                It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

                • Ech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I wasn’t responding to them, so how does that matter?

          • Alien Nathan Edward
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

            Whatever you’re arguing for or against, you’re arguing like a drunk uncle. You’re taking it to an extreme that it’s obvious no one actually intended, and then arguing against that extreme like it was the original point.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m not arguing against extremes, I’m arguing against a bad argument. And I’m not drunk, I only wish I were.