• @Sentinian
    link
    English
    811 months ago

    So on the topic, can someone explain why birth rates are so important if it isn’t lower then the death rate? I see this issue so much and I really can’t find a good issue other then economic reasons

    • @vind@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      If the birth rate is too low, the population will progressively become older and older with fewer young people there to support them

      • @Sentinian
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        So what is considered a good birth rate? I would assume over 1 should be fine.

        • SybilVane
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          2.1 is maintenance level. Each child has 2 parents, and the .1 accounts for infant deaths, etc.

          • @Sentinian
            link
            English
            411 months ago

            Put like that, I can see the issue.

      • Ataraxia
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Once all the old people did which will be soon then the issue solves itself. Then maintaining a manageable population will be easy.

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      1011 months ago

      the country will be full of old people and no one to take care of them

    • @Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      1011 months ago

      Really your only answers are going to be based in economics.

      A society can absolutely thrive with a 1:1 ratio, but not built around a capitalistic mindset. Quite frankly China’s probably the best person to have this problem and they ignore the whims of capitalism for their countries residents quite often.

      Possible non-economic considerations could be not having enough people to build a military and lack of cultural exportation. Both of which China doesn’t really have any problems with.