• andrew
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, we didn’t nationalize Lockheed-Martin or Boeing or Northrop-Grumman or Raytheon or General Dynamics, etc. I think we can survive without nationalizing the company as we’ve done throughout our defense history.

    • @Uniquitous
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      Those companies had boards of directors and people at the top who were known to be reliable partners. SpaceX has an idiotic juvenile at the helm. The situations are barely even comparable.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Those companies had boards of directors and people at the top who were known to be reliable partners. SpaceX has an idiotic juvenile at the helm. The situations are barely even comparable.

        Not a student of history I take it? I give you Howard Hughes.

      • @HollandJim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        SpaceX and Tesla now have effective senior management that insulate their divisions from Musk. His impact there is increasingly minimal, if at all present.

        Where Musk is allowed to be Musk is Twitter, an emblem of his wonderful management style.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      None of those companies had the ability to stop their equipment in the field from working if they decided one day they’d rather support our enemies. And they didn’t have a history of being influenced by our enemies.

      The article makes it clear that Musk has already gotten Ukrainian soldiers killed with his shenanigans. We should not allow him the chance to do it again.

    • @hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Its unclear that we are surviving them, or at least not paying them blood money too.