• @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Data leak? In the security field, they categorize it as “information disclosure”… But it doesn’t have the same level of gravitas to it

    • @db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      We have investigated this unintended information disclosure and have concluded it’s the fault of the users for having information.

      • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Carries the same weight as “Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly”. It’s the fault of those little green men in kerbal space program.

    • @lando55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It does if you consider it from the point of view of a. Someone went out of their way to design this API so as to allow this or b. A team of individuals deployed it without realizing how it would be exploited

      You can generally learn things from a breach, but finding and remediating systemic issues like those mentioned above is a big ask

      Edit: I either responded to the wrong comment or misunderstood what you said. It’s late in the day…

      • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I think you replied to the right post (mine) but I didn’t downvote you.

        Information disclosure doesn’t necessarily imply it’s intentional or unintentional, just that information was disclosed. But in a sense I do agree somewhat with that you said, only that WHO the person who developed the API receives that message from makes a huge difference. The IT security team coming to you and says “information disclosure” is scarier than a team mate