alphacyberranger to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 10 months agoIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1901
arrow-up1901imageIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldalphacyberranger to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square134fedilink
minus-squarenewIdentitycakelinkfedilink14•10 months agoA decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
minus-square@over_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•10 months agoAnd? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc? It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
minus-square@over_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•10 months agoYou’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.
minus-square@amki@feddit.delinkfedilink1•10 months agoFrom the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
A decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
And? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc?
It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
You’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.
From the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though