• animist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Last I checked Japan was in a different ocean

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good thing that the proposal is not for Japan to join NATO then. The proposal is to have a place to discuss matters that concern the security of of both Japan and NATO countries.

      • animist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Guess I should probably start actually reading the articles then

        • hanabatake@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Nato [stands for] north Atlantic, and both article V and article VI [in its statutes] clearly limit the scope to north Atlantic,” a French official, who asked not to be named, said on Tuesday.

          Actually, it is what they said

          Despite calls for Nato to work more closely with allies in north-east Asia, France is apparently reluctant to support anything that fuels tensions between the alliance and China.

          Of course, it is because France does not want a conflict with China