He has literally stated his life goal is to “make liberals’ lives miserable” because some Catholic priest wannabes were racist to him in seminary.
Which would be cool of him if he’d like, not picked the bootlicking side. Or if he wasn’t doing what those miserable dicks wanted? Or knew what a liberal was?
1: They were mostly Democrats, and he’s too dumb to realize they almost certainly became Republicans.
2: He never abandoned his Marxist roots, used the term “liberal” ideologically to a bunch of Republicans that didn’t know he meant them too, and is entering the final stages of his accelerationist master plan. Because he’s a moron.
3: He’s actually just a greedy sociopath who does what he’s bribed to do.
The only way he’ll ever leave his position is feet first. Just like RBG and Scalia.
He has literally stated his life goal is to “make liberals’ lives miserable” because some Catholic priest wannabes were racist to him in seminary.
Which would be cool of him if he’d like, not picked the bootlicking side. Or if he wasn’t doing what those miserable dicks wanted? Or knew what a liberal was?
deleted by creator
I have three theories.
1: They were mostly Democrats, and he’s too dumb to realize they almost certainly became Republicans.
2: He never abandoned his Marxist roots, used the term “liberal” ideologically to a bunch of Republicans that didn’t know he meant them too, and is entering the final stages of his accelerationist master plan. Because he’s a moron.
3: He’s actually just a greedy sociopath who does what he’s bribed to do.
¿Por qué no los tres?
Sounds about par for the course