- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- technews@radiation.party
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- technews@radiation.party
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
these places are telling on themselves making it a ‘requirement’. obviously it’s shittier in every way, if it was somehow exciting and fun and collaborative it would be a welcome announcement.
we need better WFH laws, this could literally revolutionize society and it’s being rolled back because some rich dickheads starting gambling on office buildings
It’s more complicated I’m some places. I believe there are places where it’s not just a fear of depreciated building value. There are literally contracts in violation because they require a certain amount of occupancy.
Oh no! Anyway….
Yes, that’s people who bet on buildings and lost.
It’s called investing. Every investment carries with it the risk of loss. Some more than others.
Oooh, business idea !
Occupancy as a service !!!
US schools have been doing that for many years. Their funding is dependent on warm body count.
Oh well, they can rot, too.