• @Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    The company’s vessel, Suez Rajan Limited, transported the contraband to the US and “incurred the significant expenses associated with the vessel’s voyage to the United States,” according to the DOJ.

    Here.

    Literally just try reading the fucking article instead of acting high and mighty without any effort because you want to be right.

    • @CmdrShepard
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Where does it state blood was spilled? If the US seized the ship out in the open ocean (piracy), how would the company have incurred any expenses on the journey to the US? They wouldn’t be the ones piloting the ship.

      • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        What? What? You aren’t even making sens and not talking as if you read the article or understand what is being talked about here.

        They told a ship of an American finance holding company to get it’s butt to their borders or suffer consequences and made the company pay for fees, and it’s own gas usage.

        I quoted the part of the article where it says they piloted the ship back to the US? Also you could still have the company pay all costs associated. So many people in here who don’t read.

        • @CmdrShepard
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Yes it’s clear people don’t read. For example, when someone is asked to provide evidence to the claim that “blood was spilled” or “piracy occurred,” people respond with a quote about the company “incurring expenses” as if that is in any way relevant or satisfies the question.

            • @CmdrShepard
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Yes apparently. Up until this reply, your comment was in the comment chain talking about how “blood was spilled” and people demanding proof of this.