• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes. Also that has no relevance here.

    Are you suggesting the Iranian government is not a hell state that deserves sanctions?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plenty of hell states deserve sanctions, including the US. Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions. You’re just parroting US propaganda which pretends human rights are why it applies sanctions when in reality that is the last thing on their mind.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you agree they deserve sanctions and this is a good thing.

        Why are you arguing?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m unaware of a pending invasion of Iran, and I think it’s about a year late for the kind of intervention I’d have liked to see.

        The Iranian government has no right to exist, and should absolutely be overthrown, though.