• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you agree they deserve sanctions and this is a good thing.

    Why are you arguing?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I said “Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions.” Sanctions don’t work the way you think they do. They don’t actually punish the people who make hell states the hell states that they are. If they did, then the hell state that would be among those that deserve it the most would be the USA. Do you agree with this?

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, but whether or not I agree the US should be sanctioned is not relevant here.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, because they reclaimed the oil instead of handing it over to western companies.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I’m all for destabilizing them too. Let’s do it in lieu of carbon taxes since it will have the same net result for the average American.

                    I am most definitely pro-intervention. Freedom is non-negotiable, and free countries have a moral imperative to spread liberal democracy across the planet. The strong have an obligation to protect the weak.