Is there a way to shop around for a Lemmy instance based on how many instances are blocking it and how many instances it’s blocking? For example, I noticed that the lemmygrad.ml instance is relatively popular, but it seems like a lot of other instances block it. It also blocks a bunch of other instances. So, if there are any communities on there that might be relevant to me then I would be missing out. I guess I could just create an account on a walled instance, but I would prefer not to keep creating accounts. I’d like to just find one instance that maximizes my access. Is the answer to just run my own instance?

  • Knighthawk 0811
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    can an instance have only 1 community for support and then have no content of its own? I believe that many already do (or near to it). This would likely be the recipe for blocking the least and being blocked the least.

        • CrimeDadOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ah, but I can if it’s mine, right? I’m going to give it a shot.

          • Knighthawk 0811
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            loads of people are making their own and doing pretty much this. I’m planning on giving it a try sometime over the summer. should be a fun project that I can actually keep using for a while. maybe even make my own notes or something.

            I might explore options to make private content just for myself

    • Swyper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Instance owners would block that kind of instance based on the activity of its users instead.

      • Knighthawk 0811
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        they certainly can do that. I wonder if we’ll get to that point where there are SPAM instances that every other instance will need to deal with