I agree with this in theory, but not so much in practice. Well-executed skepticism is based on thorough research and analysis. Too often people shoot from the hip and call something fake/nonsense, just based on looks or feels. This is exactly what skepticism should avoid, shouldn’t it?
Pictures of***
Until they have the rotting corpses out on display for all, then it’s probably some bullshit
“The two small alleged alien corpses, retrieved from Cusco, Peru, were presented in windowed boxes in Mexico City on Wednesday”
To make it even clearer, the article says that there are, in fact, corpses on display. Helps to actually read the article
allegedly
Allegedly what?
first sentence says alleged alien corpses, second just says corpses.
Of course it’s alleged corpses, if we knew they were definitely alien corpses we wouldn’t have this discussion
I think you can (and are encouraged to) actually visit them. I don’t know how this skepticism can be helpful, especially in a UFO-specific community.
Scepticism is incredibly useful, especially in these communities, because all too often you end up looking like gullible fucking morons.
I agree with this in theory, but not so much in practice. Well-executed skepticism is based on thorough research and analysis. Too often people shoot from the hip and call something fake/nonsense, just based on looks or feels. This is exactly what skepticism should avoid, shouldn’t it?