StrikerM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1392
arrow-up1392imageBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldStrikerM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-square@maeries@feddit.delinkfedilink37•1 year agoAverage doesn’t mean that 50% are above it. That’s what the median is for
minus-square@Vigge93@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink61•1 year agoBut in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
minus-squaredadarobotlinkfedilink1•1 year agoBut wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
minus-square@Vigge93@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•1 year agoIt depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.
Average doesn’t mean that 50% are above it. That’s what the median is for
But in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
Happy data scientist noises
Dang, you are right
But wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
It depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.
Look at you with your above-median IQ.
deleted by creator