Amazon Prime Video will soon come with ads, or a $2.99 monthly charge to dodge them::Amazon’s Prime Video will begin showing ads during shows and movies early next year.

  • @glimpseintotheshit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Prime Video isn’t profitable and they need it to be. They included it with Prime to build a user base but they were always going to charge or make you watch ads after that. And that’s perfectly fine because running a service that’s never going to make any money is fucking stupid.

    If you don’t like it, don’t pay but stop with that “big corp makes enough money so keep giving me shit for free” bullshit.

    Would love to read your pitch for a streaming service that doesn’t charge money and doesn’t show any ads though

    • Grant_M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      The multi-billionaire owned Amazon (A company that pays no taxes) already charges for their service.

      • @glimpseintotheshit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        They charge for Prime (Delivery) and until now, Prime Video was included in that price. I hate Amazon as much as the next guy (don’t even haven an account) but all i read from you guys is exactly this kind of unconstructive rambling.

        What the fuck do you expect? That a listed mega corporation just goes like “Oh you know what we make billions, what does it even matter if one of our services doesn’t make any money, let’s just keep going, not like we have shareholders to answer to”.

        Remember when people used to pay 5 bucks to rent a VHS for ONE DAY and no one lost their mind about it? Without constantly whining about Blockbusters profit margin?

        But thanks for clearing up that Amazon is a billionaire owned company, only read that for the 500th time this week.

      • @glimpseintotheshit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Not what they pointed out though. It’s just the usual, mindless big corp rant you can’t escape on here.

        Existing Prime users got all this content without additional charges for years, that’s what I meant when I said free but you probably know that. If you think that’s a sustainable way to keep producing content for billions of dollars, it’s very naive imo.

        But feel free to point out what would have been a better strategy and maybe actually start a discussion

    • @ApeNo1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Wow. You need to Netflix and chill.

      I have been a Prime member since 2014 and joined exclusively for Prime Video access. Of course nothing is free. I am now going to pay more, yes you heard right, and will choose to continue being a paying member even at the higher cost, so that I can receive the SAME service and not have it degraded with ads. I hate ads and for all the services I subscribe to, 4 video streaming and 1 music streaming, I always pay the premium to not see ads.

      You need to have a good hard look at yourself if you think defending Amazon puts you on the right ethical side of the fence. These cheap extra ad based profits, that deliver no new customer value, will not go to raising the low salaries many of their workforce endure, or relieve the pressure with their mandated 6% non-regrettable attrition policies, or stop their practices of stealing designs from small businesses and undercutting them with Amazon branded equivalents, or ensure taxes are paid in the relevant countries, or prevent further large scale lay offs.

      This additional subscription cost is a first world problem for me but Amazon is not only an easy target for constant criticism, but a deserving one.