• @fr0g@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because it rarely really solves the actual problem while creating a lot of spill on damage and possibly furthering violence. See the US war on drugs or Duterte’s mass executions in the Philippines for very drastic examples.

    • PenguinJuice
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Being tough on violent gangs causes a lot of damage? Can you elaborate on this?

      Drugs shouldn’t be considered criminal so I agree with you there. But violence, robbery, absolutely should be incredibly enforced.

      • @fr0g@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        Okay, and what would “incredibly enforcing it” look like in your opinion?

        You could establish longer criminal sentences. But longer sentences generally don’t have a higher deterent effect and you just end up with people who have been isolated from society longer or are harder to integrate.

        You could make it easier to arrest people/have criminal proceedings, but that will also mean more innocent people will be subjected to harsh measures and grow disdainful of the police.

        You could increase police presence in general. But that is also likely to harbour mistrust and have more people subject to unfair scrutiny and would probably to little to prevent the crimes we are talking about here.

        And mind you, all these measures will be much more likely to target migrants who already might have a not too rosy view of law enforcement and general society, so you’re always risking exacerbating the same societal issues that are also contributing to the crimes.

        So what exactly would you suggest?

        • @fr0g@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          And if you look at societies in general, those with the harshest most authoritarian rules don’t really tend to be the most peaceful, crime free ones, but rather harsher rules and a harsher society tend to go in lockstep. Because violence and harshness tend to breed more violence and harshness and the fact that one of the sides enacting the violence is the state and the supposed “good guys” doesn’t magically change that.

          Of course that doesn’t mean that there’s no place for harsher laws or tougher measures in certain situations ever. But it definitely means that the harder you hit, the more precise you have to be, if you don’t want things to fire back on you. Which is a lot easier said than done.

        • PenguinJuice
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Being very hard on crime. Hand out long sentences to offenders.

          • @fr0g@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Longer sentences very generally don’t do much to deter crime. No criminal thinks things through with a calculator and goes “oh well, if doing this might get me into jail for three years, that’s a risk I’m willing to take. But ten years? Ouwie wowie, I better not do this then!” Most people don’t even think, care or know about the possible repercussions or think they will actually get caught.

              • @fr0g@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                81 year ago

                Well that kinda depends on whether longer sentences are more or less likely to make someone recommit crimes. If it’s the former you might just end up with more people committing crimes.

                  • @wldmr@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Can you provide an example of a country where harsher prison sentences made the country more peaceful?