• @Techmaster@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s absurd that we require a majority vote for house speaker. It should be as simple as whoever gets the most votes. Or you have to vote for A or B for your vote to even be counted. None of this “present” nonsense.

    212 vs 199, ok Hakeem Jeffries wins.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      Plurality voting is one of the best systems if your goal is to elect someone that most people don’t want.

      • @SYLOH@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        This!
        Have two+ really good candidates and an awful one with niche appeal.
        Guess who plurality gives the awful one a great chance at winning.

    • @rbhfd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      33
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Most likely, this would make the Republicans vote for whoever their candidate is, rather than a minority Democrat winner.

      Not saying I disagree with you per se. I had the same thought when reading this news.

      The current system was probably designed to promote compromise, even across party lines. But we all know how well that’s working out these days.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        perhaps a period of immunity then. Prime Ministers in the UK get a year of immunity if they win a no confidence vote

        • @hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          The speaker isn’t a job laid out in law other than being listed as 3rd in succession. It exists at the acceptance of some rules adopted by a majority of the house. Those rules could just as well not include any speaker, it could call for everyone to dress as a banana on Tuesday.

        • @Birdie@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          That implies your government is functioning as it is meant to. Here in the US, it’s not. It’s just not.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Majority vote would lead to even more deadlocks and partisanship