• CmdrShepard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In reality, the future will be hydrogen cars,

    In what reality? They’ve been developing these for years and haven’t made much headway. Fossil fuels are finite while lithium batteries can be recycled over and over. What exactly is unsustainable about them?

    Sorry, but no amount of lying to yourself will make BEVs a viable technology

    If they aren’t a viable technology, then how are there millions of them on the road currently?

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      BEVs predate internal combustion engines. People have waited a long time for it to happen. Hydrogen has the same benefit as batteries, just minus any mining to begin with.

      BEVs are the result of huge subsidies. They are not really in demand by most people. A lot of this debate is within a cluster of out-of-touch rich people.

      • CmdrShepard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hydrogen has the same benefit as batteries, just minus any mining to begin with.

        Hydrogen is currently produced from natural gas which is mined from the earth.

        BEVs are the result of huge subsidies. They are not really in demand by most people. A lot of this debate is within a cluster of out-of-touch rich people.

        Obviously written by someone with very little knowledge of the topic. Every form of fuel is subsidized whether that be fossil fuels, electric, or hydrogen. How about, at the very least, you take two seconds to Google things before you speak of them.

        I’d bet 0% of the people you’re ‘debating’ with have any issue with hydrogen vehicle development. Everyone is taking issue with you and your ridiculous, uninformed comments.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And so is most electricity. The point is that it can be made from water. You’re just repeating an argument used against all EVs.

          Not only do I know more than pretty much anyone here, I can immediately recognize all of the dumb myths and PR talking points everyone brings up. This is old news for me.

          Everyone who oppose hydrogen pretty much has an agenda. If not an owner of a BEV, they are an investor of some kind.
          Ultimately, why would anyone oppose green energy or green technology? Nevermind anyone who calls himself an environmentalist. It’s the most absurd fact in all of this. So many people here are lying to themselves about what they really believe and what their real motivations are.