• @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sadly Firefox on iPhone doesn’t translate [human languages]. I don’t want to use Chrome on iPhone and Firefox on PC because synchronising bookmarks and history is too important to give up.

      • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Blame Apple for that bullshit.

        This one isn’t on Apple. There’s nothing stopping Firefox from having translate on iPhone. It’s on Chrome and Edge.

          • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            It’s available as an add-on for Firefox on PC. Language translation is built into the application for Chrome and Edge on iPhone.

            • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
              link
              fedilink
              English
              121 year ago

              Yes, that’s what I’m trying to say. The browsers have different methods for providing same functionality. But due to restrictions on one platform, Firefox can’t provide the functionality that the users want.

              Also no-addons policy means no adblock either. Which is quite an L.

              • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                But due to restrictions on one platform, Firefox can’t provide the functionality that the users want.

                With all due respect, I don’t think you understand. There is no restriction on language translation on iPhone. Firefox merely doesn’t support built-in language translation. It might have been easier for them if Apple permitted add-ons on iPhone, but it definitely does not prevent language translation. Chrome and Edge have built language translation into their apps for iPhone to facilitate this. Firefox could do the same, but have chosen not to.

                • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  91 year ago

                  Firefox doesn’t do that because modularity has been their thing for a long time while Google and MS would prefer if you’d start using their browsers as they are.

                  Apple’s restrictions aren’t targeted towards Firefox but inadvertently do exactly that.

    • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I don’t own an iPhone, but this seems like a totally fair criticism and I don’t see any replies refuting it, so what’s with all the downvotes? I swear to god this place is ridiculous sometimes, these people won’t be happy until you jump through every hoop imaginable to use the Lemmy approved software. Only positive feedback allowed!

      • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        because this is inherently Apple’s fault and not Mozilla’s.

        Apple’s the one forcing every browser on iOS to be a reskinned version of Safari. And it’s perfectly understandable that Mozilla doesn’t want to waste time and resources developing features for a Firefox-branded Safari when they could be working on their own browser.

        • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          What’s your point? The dude gave a perfectly valid reason to not using Firefox, regardless of who’s fault it is.

          But also, how on earth would building a functional browser for a phone that owns 55% of the US market share be a waste of time and resources?

          • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            it’s a perfectly valid reason for not using Firefox, my point is that they’re on the wrong platform. It’s the user’s own fault, because they chose a closed platform like iOS. Developing free software for iOS is a waste of time, since everything is under Apple’s tyrannical rule and they get to decide which web engine you use, they can disallow extensions and make it very hard (and against their ToS) to sideload apps.

            I don’t like Mozilla at all, and that’s why I use Firefox derivatives and not Firefox itself, but I’m glad they don’t waste time developing for a re-skinned Safari. Those resources are best used in their own web engine.

            • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              these people won’t be happy until you jump through every hoop imaginable to use the Lemmy approved software

              and hardware apparently lol