• @MJBrune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Uh, I don’t want to know exactly what you are implying but those people are still people. It’s really not okay to threaten groups like that. These are folks making a living where they can. How does that make it okay to imply that you are going to attack them?

    • @thepaperpilot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      The bit about “no” not meaning “no” means they’re specifically implying meta employees can be sexually assaulted even if they say no. I’m sure it’s said in jest, but it’s still a fairly offensive comment.

      • @Leafeytea@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That is NOT what I said and NOT what I meant. The Mod removed this comment due to everyone saying I was somehow threatening everyone. They did not publish my response to the message they sent me, so this needs to be cleared up.

        What I am saying is that clearly these people do not take NO for an answer, even when it’s clear NO means NO. They ignored it and did what they wanted anyway. I said I would keep this behaviour in mind whenever I am downtown because I live in SF and go by their headquarters literally every day and have already see a lot of their people, and in fact some awful behaviour from some that work there. Interacting with them is something a **WANT TO AVOID. ** I was not implying in ANY WAY that I intended to harm or threaten them.

    • M. Orange
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It reads to me like they’re saying that they feel like they might be attacked by Meta employees.

      That said, it’s uh… quite a choice to have made to say that.

      • @nromdotcom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Oh, interesting. I also initially read it as a thinly-veiled threat but I think you’re right it was more of a “will i be assaulted”. Still a weird thing to say.