ZeroCool to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoMax users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1210file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinemoviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1210external-linkMax users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comZeroCool to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinemoviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareGoronmonlinkfedilink5•1 year ago Why should quality be a tier? Because it costs more to stream 4k content than lower quality content? Not agreeing with it, but the justification is easy to make.
minus-square@thesprongler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•1 year agoIt costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files.
minus-squareGoronmonlinkfedilink2•1 year ago It costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files. You are wording this like you are disagreeing, while still agreeing with what I said.
Because it costs more to stream 4k content than lower quality content?
Not agreeing with it, but the justification is easy to make.
It costs inconsequentially more to host large files, sure, but the cost is usually on the consumer vis-à-vis their ISP to stream larger files.
You are wording this like you are disagreeing, while still agreeing with what I said.