8GB RAM on M3 MacBook Pro ‘Analogous to 16GB’ on PCs, Claims Apple::Following the unveiling of new MacBook Pro models last week, Apple surprised some with the introduction of a base 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 chip,…

    • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 months ago

      Since 1990.

      I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

      They also always cheapens out on stuff, even when they used “PC” hardware, CPU from 4 years ago etc and RAM & HDD/SSD were so small you basicallyhad to buy a “next tier” machine (much more expensive).

      • @superschurke@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

        But this exists… There’s still differences amongst PC CPUs in per-cycle performance…

        • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          Sure, but their claim was just bullshit back then.

          They did optimise Photoshop wildly for Mac to try to show they were right IIRC.

      • @uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        It is not theirs, it is IBM’s. Or rather Freescale’s, now bought out by NXP. Was true at the time.