A Georgia high school football coach who was criticized for holding a baptism on school grounds for some of his players has been fired weeks later.

Superintendent Kristen Waters said this week that the coach was dismissed from coaching Tattnall County High School for reasons unrelated to the baptism, but for an incident after a Nov. 3 game. She did not provide further details.

“The safety and security of our students is paramount to Tattnall County Board of Education,” Waters said in a statement to NBC affiliate WSAV of Savannah. “Based on the outcome of an investigation into an incident that occurred Friday night, November 3rd while traveling after the football game, the District decided that it would seek a Head football coach that aligned with the best interests of the students.”

    • admiralteal
      link
      fedilink
      92
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be clear, he wasn’t “praying on the field”. He was leading the whole team in prayer as part of the school event, at the 50 yard line, with the audience watching, inviting others to participate, apparently creating an atmosphere of pressure to participate, etc… He was using his role as a coach and as faculty of the school to formally endorse and encourage his particular religion as part of the identity of the team.

      And the stupid fucks at the SCOTUS thought this was not an establishment violation based on lies. Kavanaugh literally repeatedly lied in his opinion on it, claiming repeatedly that it was a private prayer instead of a giant, intentional public spectacle.

      Anyone who looks at the photos of clips of the prayer will have ZERO illusion that this was a small private prayer on the field. It was a megachurch-inspired moment.

      • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        441 year ago

        And then the coach quit after being reinstated because his mission was accomplished and he didn’t actually give a shit about coaching football.

      • @logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        Correct me if I’m misremembering, but wasn’t this also the case where he was supposed to have standing because he was fired, but it turned out that he wasn’t fired?

        Like he failed to do something that was required to renew his contract, and so he basically quit the first time, as well.

        So he had no standing to file the lawsuit, and therefore, SCOTUS shouldn’t have taken the case.

        • @VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Part of what I remember is that the coaching job was in Washington, and he sued for the job after moving to Florida. Then, when asked, he said he’d be ready to start coaching in Washington again with like 3 days notice of reinstatement. He won his case, but did not move back up or try to retake his old job in any way. Makes the standing in the case look real funny.

        • @tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          he had no standing to file the lawsuit, and therefore, SCOTUS shouldn’t have taken the case.

          haha the rapists, handmaidens, and millionaire dick riders in SCOTUS don’t give a fuck about laws

        • @evatronic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          A witchfinder in 1674 wrote that lemons are icky so Alito cast the deciding vote to eliminate it.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      361 year ago

      I’ve worked closely with school administrators. That’s exactly what this is. It’s actually good reporting since everyone knows it was the baptism, but the reporter still quotes the statement from the superintendent.

      • @almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        That’s total conjecture on your part. I also went to a high school once so that’s not what happened, he actually assaulted a student and they don’t wanna release the info. I’m making the up and it has the same validity as your statement.

        • Omega
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          Tbh, I’ve worked with plenty of problematic people and where there’s smoke, there’s fire. There’s probably a multitude of other issues that they were already aware of or uncovered when they started paying more attention.

          This is also pure conjecture. But I would be surprised if there weren’t more obviously fireable offenses.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav
          link
          51 year ago

          I feel 100% confident in my statement, and I do not regret making it nor do I intend to amend it in any way. Now go eat some tendies.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Only an idiot would feel 100% about a theory they made up without evidence to support it.

    • @zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, that occurred to me too. They might have wanted to fire him for the inappropriate baptism nonsense, but didn’t want to make it about a religious issue and so came up with some other reason. Or who knows, if he’s stupid enough to do the baptism shit he’s probably a fucking weirdo and does other things that are bad ideas.