The last time this happened, voters didn’t credit Bill Clinton. That may be a bad omen, or a good one.

If the stock market chose presidents, Joe Biden would be a shoo-in for reelection in 2024. The market rallied this month amid growing optimism about the economy, with the S&P 500 zooming 1.9 percent Tuesday on news that the consumer price index rose only 3.2 percent in October (compared to 3.7 percent in September). Stocks rallied again Wednesday on news that the producer price index fell 0.5 percent. Commentators are no longer debating whether the economy will experience a “soft landing” (i.e., a reduction in inflation without recession). The only question now is when it will arrive. The S&P 500 seems to have decided it’s already here.

But the stock market doesn’t choose presidents. Voters do, and polls continue to show they think the economy is in terrible shape. A Financial Times–Michigan Ross Nationwide Survey conducted November 2–7 is absolutely brutal on this point.

  • @SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Look, you don’t know what you’re talking about, it’s fine, everything’s fine

    This is, generally, true on all counts.

    Anyone who doesn’t think avoiding a recession is better than the alternative is not a serious person worth listening to, and there is probably a link between their understanding of economics and their poverty.

    • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      I kinda get the vibe you’re trying to be smarmy. Look, saying “you should be happy you’re not in a recession, stupid” is not effective messaging. If it’s going to take losing this election for you and the DNC to learn that, I’m going to be awfully fucking cross.

        • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          I mean, it’s not like Democrats have never managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory before. I’m just saying, this is shit tier messaging, and when the whole ass republic is at stake, it sure would be nice to see them actually trying instead of phoning it in with shitty messaging because “the other guy is basically Hitler and we’ve been doing pretty well”.

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Dude the other side couldnt get it’s shit together enough to keep a speakership in place. What do you expect the Democrats to be doing? It’s a miracle the government is funded at all.

            This is a result of them trying. Biden’s “contribution” here was primarily from democrat-pushed legislation.

            • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              38 months ago

              Look, if your point is that “they deserve to use shitty messaging if they want, don’t worry about it, bro”, well, okay. That’s your opinion, and that’s fine. I don’t think it’s a smart choice, politically speaking, and that’s where I’m coming from. People are feeling the hurt right now, and I think you’re going to find that correcting their complaints with “we should be thanking Biden, actually” is bitter medicine. Maybe they know what they’re doing, but somehow this feels familiar from the '16 Clinton Campaign; like they’ve got permission to fucking phone it in because the other guy is unelectable. I hope you’re right and they really do know what they’re doing.

              • @SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                28 months ago

                My point is a rebuttal to your insinuation that Democrats are not trying to fix anything or do anything. That’s false.

                I agree Dems aren’t as good at messaging as Republicans.