The plaintiffs’ arguments in Moore v. United States have little basis in law — unless you think that a list of long-ago-discarded laissez-faire decisions from the early 20th century remain good law. And a decision favoring these plaintiffs could blow a huge hole in the federal budget. While no Warren-style wealth tax is on the books, the Moore plaintiffs do challenge an existing tax that is expected to raise $340 billion over the course of a decade.

But Republicans also hold six seats on the nation’s highest Court, so there is some risk that a majority of the justices will accept the plaintiffs’ dubious legal arguments. And if they do so, they could do considerable damage to the government’s ability to fund itself.

  • @SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    That’s a great, basic-level takedown of why OPs conspiracy theory is so exceedingly dumb.

    There’s a lot more depth to it but you don’t need the depth when even a single glance shows how stupid it is.

    These people, by definition, have wealth and power. Why would they want to change that?