@Hdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org • 7 months agoBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up179cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up179external-linkBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.net@Hdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org • 7 months agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@Enzy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkSvenska2•edit-27 months agoThis game sure removed any hopes I had for TES6
minus-squareFeydaikinlinkfedilink2•edit-27 months agoNot trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me. But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout. Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
minus-square@Enzy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkSvenska2•7 months agoUsing the same engine no doubt I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
minus-squareFeydaikinlinkfedilink1•7 months agoYes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.
This game sure removed any hopes I had for TES6
Not trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me.
But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout.
Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
Using the same engine no doubt
I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
Yes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.