If it is inseparably attached, where is it in Das Kapital?
In reality too. Go check it out sometime and read a historybook.
Or do you not mean ‘intrinsic’ and ‘inherent’ when you use those words?
Do you always go for semantics when you don’t know how to intellectually best someone? I mean, there is a reason why communism is strictly for the uneducated and violent.
Instead of showing any sympathy for the countless of victims of communism, you instead purposefully drag the conversation into some weird mud fight on a book written by someone who never touched grass.
It is of course clear why you choose to move the discourse away from the fact that communism in it’s core is just transphobia, but again, admit it and I’ll play with you.
Once again, insulting me won’t change what words mean. I have not insulted you at all. If you can’t talk to people in a civil manner, perhaps Reddit would be better suited for you.
The part in which you derailed the civil conversation I was trying to have with you on the core ideology of communism (transphobia) which you turned into a weird semantics mud fight, even though the fact that communism is inherently transphobic was already established.
Typical fascism, trying to dodge responsibility and avoiding saying the quiet parts out loud. Glad I read you hateful fucks like a book.
It was more of a rhetorical question as you tried to shift your own thoughts to show up as a quote from someone else. And with that rhetorical method I demonstrated that it in fact wasn’t about me.
Sorry, insulting me won’t change what intrinsic means.
Intrinsic.
If it is essential, where is it in Das Kapital?
Also-
Inhrent.
If it is inseparably attached, where is it in Das Kapital?
Or do you not mean ‘intrinsic’ and ‘inherent’ when you use those words?
Even better it’s in reality.
In reality too. Go check it out sometime and read a historybook.
Do you always go for semantics when you don’t know how to intellectually best someone? I mean, there is a reason why communism is strictly for the uneducated and violent.
Instead of showing any sympathy for the countless of victims of communism, you instead purposefully drag the conversation into some weird mud fight on a book written by someone who never touched grass.
It is of course clear why you choose to move the discourse away from the fact that communism in it’s core is just transphobia, but again, admit it and I’ll play with you.
Once again, insulting me won’t change what words mean. I have not insulted you at all. If you can’t talk to people in a civil manner, perhaps Reddit would be better suited for you.
I take that as an admission of fascism.
And I’ll insult fascists when I see them.
Can you please show ‘wanting civil discussion’ as part of anyone’s definition of fascism?
I can show transphobia as a part of it
Please quote me being transphobic. I would be interested in seeing what I sad that was transphobic. Unless that was a lie, of course. Was it a lie?
The part in which you derailed the civil conversation I was trying to have with you on the core ideology of communism (transphobia) which you turned into a weird semantics mud fight, even though the fact that communism is inherently transphobic was already established.
Typical fascism, trying to dodge responsibility and avoiding saying the quiet parts out loud. Glad I read you hateful fucks like a book.
Ah, now it is a core ideology.
If it is a core ideology, please show where it is in Das Kapital, which lays out the core ideologies of communism.
By the way, you insulted me after my first response to you, so I’m not sure when you were trying to have a civil conversation with me.
Umm I’m an antifascist and you’re insulting that other commenter and me. That (and apparent capitalism apologia) kinda makes you align with fascists
Again, go fuck yourself
Are you quoting yourself?
No, just you
That’s how quotes are used, otherwise it’s just a comment you know
It was more of a rhetorical question as you tried to shift your own thoughts to show up as a quote from someone else. And with that rhetorical method I demonstrated that it in fact wasn’t about me.