Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

    • @abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      Ability to choose with whom to federate with is a core concept of the Fediverse

      If you don’t want any defederation, join an instance that doesn’t do it.

      • @Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        Yeah, and it will end up with huge echochambers full of xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone. Defederation is the last step, not the first. Here, paranoia over what might happen years later down a very slippery slope makes people throw away the opportunity to actually grow the platform instead of leaving it with barely any people at all.

            • @abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              49 months ago

              xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone

              Go join a monolithic network if you are not interested in the features of the fediverse.

                  • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    19 months ago

                    Read the original comment again. They didn’t state what this person is claiming at all.

                    And yet I’m the one who can’t read…

            • @catchy_name@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Do you see the comment from user “Maalus” immediately prior to the comment that you first replied to? That’s where it was said.

              If you cannot see that comment it’d be interesting to understand why. Maybe you have blocked that user so can’t see his comment but you are seeing replies to it?

        • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          I don’t get why they want to defederate without any experience of it either. Let’s see what Meta brings to the table. Maybe they’ll shine a light on the Fediverse and we get a more varied group of people on the platform.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        No, that’s not a core concept of Fediverse, that’s exactly the opposite. You want echo chambers? There are plenty of them already. It should be the user who decides what content to see and with which instances to interact, not instance admins.

        Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites. That would be a death of the web.

        • @abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites.

          Imagine a worse, less fitting analogy

          You can literally spin up your own instance in 20 minutes and see every instance ever if you’d like, it’s a choice and its good to have

    • @aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      On the contrary, defederation is vital to the health of the network. Choosing which instances to not interact with, like far-right groups and hate speech groups, allows users to focus on reasonable content on their home server.

      The instance should also be transparent on which instances they defederate with so occasionally the user can venture out into the wild west and see other instances and their points of view.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        That causes fragmentation of the network, which in turn will kill Fedi over time.

        • @aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          On the contrary: Advising popular instances to defederate with threads will actually help promote diversity of instances, since the Threads population is orders of magnitude a larger network than Mastodon. Having popular instances defederate with threads will keep lemmy from actually just merging into the threads network.

    • @FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Exactly cuz threads will lure a lot of people in the fediverse after the fediverse gets even more accessible and for all means more recognition than we can think about defederating threads.

    • @EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      Millions of Facebook users outnumbering previous users 100 to 1 will kill it. Oh, there’ll be more activity than ever, but it will be a sanitised corporate safe space for advertisers, where millions of normies argue about politics, with misinformation and ads sprinkled throughout.

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        That’s called growth. Or do you want to keep Lemmy exclusive for marginals?