Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    11 months ago

    Defederation is cancer and it will kill Fediverse faster than any Meta.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ability to choose with whom to federate with is a core concept of the Fediverse

      If you don’t want any defederation, join an instance that doesn’t do it.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, and it will end up with huge echochambers full of xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone. Defederation is the last step, not the first. Here, paranoia over what might happen years later down a very slippery slope makes people throw away the opportunity to actually grow the platform instead of leaving it with barely any people at all.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone

              Go join a monolithic network if you are not interested in the features of the fediverse.

                • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  They literally quoted that statement. Your lack of reading comprehension sounds like a you problem.

                  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Read the original comment again. They didn’t state what this person is claiming at all.

                    And yet I’m the one who can’t read…

            • catchy_name@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Do you see the comment from user “Maalus” immediately prior to the comment that you first replied to? That’s where it was said.

              If you cannot see that comment it’d be interesting to understand why. Maybe you have blocked that user so can’t see his comment but you are seeing replies to it?

        • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t get why they want to defederate without any experience of it either. Let’s see what Meta brings to the table. Maybe they’ll shine a light on the Fediverse and we get a more varied group of people on the platform.

            • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Anyone wondering it’s a long winded article blaming meta for a genocide, personally I don’t really see how it fits the conversation beyond ‘zuck bad’ because it’s nothing that’s going to happen here

              • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                It is an illustration (and a particularly powerful one) of just where Meta’s ethics lie.

                You don’t invite serial killers to your Halloween party. You don’t invite Meta to your online community. Same reason in both cases.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, that’s not a core concept of Fediverse, that’s exactly the opposite. You want echo chambers? There are plenty of them already. It should be the user who decides what content to see and with which instances to interact, not instance admins.

        Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites. That would be a death of the web.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites.

          Imagine a worse, less fitting analogy

          You can literally spin up your own instance in 20 minutes and see every instance ever if you’d like, it’s a choice and its good to have

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can build your variant of Chrome yourself as well. Analogy is fitting.

    • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      On the contrary, defederation is vital to the health of the network. Choosing which instances to not interact with, like far-right groups and hate speech groups, allows users to focus on reasonable content on their home server.

      The instance should also be transparent on which instances they defederate with so occasionally the user can venture out into the wild west and see other instances and their points of view.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That causes fragmentation of the network, which in turn will kill Fedi over time.

        • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          On the contrary: Advising popular instances to defederate with threads will actually help promote diversity of instances, since the Threads population is orders of magnitude a larger network than Mastodon. Having popular instances defederate with threads will keep lemmy from actually just merging into the threads network.

    • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly cuz threads will lure a lot of people in the fediverse after the fediverse gets even more accessible and for all means more recognition than we can think about defederating threads.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I totally agree.

      Users should have the power to block instances themselves, not just moderators.

    • EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Millions of Facebook users outnumbering previous users 100 to 1 will kill it. Oh, there’ll be more activity than ever, but it will be a sanitised corporate safe space for advertisers, where millions of normies argue about politics, with misinformation and ads sprinkled throughout.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s called growth. Or do you want to keep Lemmy exclusive for marginals?