A lobby group that represents major tech companies like TikTok, Snapchat, Meta etc is suing Ohio's Republican Attorney General Dave Yost for introducing a bill that mandates children to obtain parental consent before using social media apps

A new law, signed by Republican Governor Mike DeWine in July, is considered as a way to safeguard children’s mental health, citing concerns about the intentionally addictive nature of social media.

  • @t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    30•10 months ago

    Anytime someone’s claim is the protection of children, you should apply a VERY heavy dose of scepticism and scrutiny.

    • conciselyverbose
      11•10 months ago

      I absolutely agree, but “you need parental consent to have an account” doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.

      • @regul@lemm.ee
        10•10 months ago

        If you take it at face value, which you should really never do when conservatives are involved.

        By my estimation, this (and bills like it) are intended to do two things:

        1. Reduce younger people’s access to points of view outside of the US political mainstream. In particular, Republican politicians seem very convinced that TikTok is turning kids gay/trans/atheist/communist/etc.
        2. Allow for aggrieved conservatives to extract money via lawsuit from corporations Republican politicians view as hostile to them. Because laws like this will obviously be circumvented, and these laws are written such that the platform is liable in these cases, these laws open them up to potentially millions of lawsuits every time a teenager gets an Instagram account.
      • @JCPhoenix@beehaw.orgEnglish
        8•10 months ago

        Doesn’t COPPA already require this for children under 13? This state bill raises it to under 16.

        I guess it comes down to the particulars. Is there something more onerous in the Ohio bill than in COPPA? Because I don’t think I’ve heard of any company seriously getting mad that COPPA is a thing.

        • conciselyverbose
          4•10 months ago

          You’d think if it was they’d be pointing to that.

          As far as I’m concerned “you must have parental consent until 18” is perfectly legitimate, because you can’t really sign contracts or fully legally consent until then.