@ooli@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months ago'It hasn't delivered': The spectacular failure of self-checkout technologywww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square426fedilinkarrow-up1608cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1608external-link'It hasn't delivered': The spectacular failure of self-checkout technologywww.bbc.com@ooli@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square426fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-square@jol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoHow do you know there’s not someone looking at se purity cameras triggering random audits?
minus-square@Nollij@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoThen that’s not random by any definition of the word. It’s targeted. It’s entirely possible, even likely, that management would keep claiming that it’s random when it’s not. But then we’re not talking about any algorithms.
How do you know there’s not someone looking at se purity cameras triggering random audits?
Then that’s not random by any definition of the word. It’s targeted.
It’s entirely possible, even likely, that management would keep claiming that it’s random when it’s not. But then we’re not talking about any algorithms.
That’s the point I’m making.