Looking for answers.

  • Rhynoplaz
    link
    fedilink
    606 months ago

    Have you tried reading the label? I find that sums it up rather nicely.

      • Rhynoplaz
        link
        fedilink
        206 months ago

        Wait. Are you telling me that the US actually has a better standard for Nutritional Facts than other first world countries?

        And somehow we’re STILL the fattest nation in the world?

        • @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          The standard US “Nutrition Facts” label is very limited and typically doesn’t include much information on micro nutrients. I don’t know how it compares to other regions, but it certainly leaves a lot to be desired.

          • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            36 months ago

            Yeah it would be nice to have mandatory micronutrient labeling. Some labels have them, others don’t. I think it might be up to the producer to decide which micronutrients they can list.

        • @uienia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Nah, the US has “per serving” on the label instead of “per 100 gr.”. And since “per serving” is mostly an arbitrarily term (the legislation which defines it basically admits so much even), it means food producers can grossly mislead consumers about the contents of their food.

      • NaN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        Interestingly, UK foods destined for import in the US market use the US label and do include that information. Heinz Beans have 50mb calcium, 1.5mg Iron, and 370mg potassium per 130g serving, for example.

          • _haha_oh_wow_
            link
            fedilink
            English
            66 months ago

            Huh, well it’s definitely got some of the nutritional values added (fat, salt, carbs, protein, etc.), but vitamins appear to be absent. In the US, if they weren’t listed, I would assume they were not present but TBF, I have no idea how (if at all) labeling is regulated in the UK.

      • Chainweasel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes it does, well it should anyway. it’s required by law in the US, and there’s no way in hell the US has stricter laws regarding nutrition.

          • Chainweasel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            86 months ago

            How in the world does the backwards ass United States have better nutrition laws than another first world country? a European one at that

              • Chainweasel
                link
                fedilink
                English
                76 months ago

                So, maybe 20 years ago when I was in middle school I had a dream that I was being chased by a long, giant, weasel with hundreds of legs like a millipede. This happened at an overnight LAN party at a friend’s house. I sometimes talk in my sleep and my friends overheard me muttering about the “chainweasel” in my dreams and I never lived it down.

            • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              More strict sanitation laws often. It doesn’t matter how non-food related the system (like the box crushing machine) if it is going in a US food plant it will follow IP69K.

    • @lauha
      link
      46 months ago

      Labels do tell about fat and carbohydrates, but not proteins, vitamins and other such thing