• @EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    so Starlink already put over 5k up there with talks of taking that up to as many as 42k eventually. How much crap does ATT intend to put up there?

    • @SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      Shhhh. That is future poor peoples problem and capitalism doesn’t think about those people. Now, wouldn’t you love to pay hundreds of dollars a month for the privilege of being able to surf the internet ANYWHERE in the world at lightning fast speeds? Doesn’t that sound great? All the porn all the time. What could be better?

      • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well the starlink ones aren’t going to be space trash-- they eventually fall out of orbit and burn up. Hopefully these go with the same plan

        • @EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          The main issue ATM tho, from what I’ve heard, is what this huge amount of extra crap is doing to us studying space from the ground.

          • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            There is that. The other issue which I ignored but is significant is the emissions from the rocket launches getting the satellites up there in the first place

            • @Infinite@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Globally, rocket launches are something like 0.005% of the emissions of the airline industry.

        • @hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          You need to orbit them low enough to experience drag if you want reasonable latency.