• @einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s all fun and games until Facebook starts adding features, then eventually starts defining what the fediverse should do to maintain federation with Facebook.

    • aeternum
      link
      fedilink
      751 year ago

      Embrance, Extend, Extinguish. Enshittification. Call it what you will, but i don’t think this will end well for us.

    • V699
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      This is my biggest fear. The hidden weakness of the fediverse is that the largest implementation gets to set the rules of federation

      • sab
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree. Mastodon does not “set the rules” for federation of Kbin, Lemmy, Funkwhale, BookWyrm, Pixelfed, Peertube, or any other platform in the Fediverse. The platforms are interoperable when it makes sense, but they are designed to fill different needs and it makes no sense for them to follow some centralized “rules of federation”.

    • fbievan
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I think meta just wants to captailize on twitters demise.

      I don’t see how crushing activtypub would help them in anyway.

      Mastodon is already massive and many companies (and the EU) have their own instance.

        • fbievan
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Activity pub is more than just mastodon, there is book ratings, and also peertube.

          I don’t see meta ever going there.

          • @fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            191 year ago

            I don’t see meta ever going there.

            out of the goodness of their collective hearts? They already sell books (through ads) and host video, why do you think they’d stop after only crushing federalized social media? Because they can’t be bothered?

            • fbievan
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No I just don’t see meta wanting to compete in those fields

        • @Magiwarriorx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No? Up until very recently, Mastodon essentially was the Fediverse, and it was laughably tiny compared to Meta. It cracked 2.5 million active monthly users in January, which sounds like a lot until you realize Instagram has 2 billion active monthly users. More importantly, the active user count for the whole Fediverse was in decline since that January number, down to 1.4 million monthly users at the start of June. The Reddit drama drove an increase in users, but no way Meta is agile enough to shove this out the door in response to something that recent. Its not like Mastodon has a glowing public perception outside of the Fediverse, either.

          Truthfully, I don’t think Meta gives a damn about the current Fediverse; it’s too small to matter. Whatever their goal, I don’t think we were a consideration.

      • starlinguk
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Meta gets paid a fortune to spread disinformation. That’s why they’re doing this.

        • fbievan
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          That is a very real thing they do. I like this reasoning

    • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Welcome to FOSS software. It’s constantly evolving and forking itself. If Facebook wanted to fork ActivityPub RIGHT NOW, they could.

      How would that impact your life at all? You could stay using lemmy and mastodon like you have been.