• @CassowaryTom
    link
    209 months ago

    Well, we are talking about him now, and millions of people have hears his message in his own words. Or he could still be alive in a sea of picketers being ignored. I don’t approve of suicide either, bit he very effectively got a lot of people to listen to him, or at least to hear him. We all should be so silent.

    • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the other commenter will continue to ignore this fairly obvious facet to his death.

    • @Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      For 2 weeks. And then he won’t be part of conversation until the next person does it. Then we’ll all look back. Say remember when they did this too. And forget again.

      Taking away your ability to bring about change isn’t effective protest.

      • I remember pictures and articles of such in textbooks growing up in Florida. That was 1963 in Siagom. 61 years, Half a world away and his sacrifice had an impact to this day. 2 weeks is a bit of an understatement.

            • @Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              59 months ago

              I’m refuting the general idea here that a person commiting suicide changed the world for the better. Especially when it was someone concerned about what was going on. Who might have gone on to actually help.

              Regardless of the where/when. A concerned person choosing suicide as their means of protest only takes away their ability to bring about change.