• @frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69 months ago

    There’s some really high bandwidth stuff that USB-C isn’t rated for. You have to really press the limits, though. Something like 4k + 240Hz + HDR.

    • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      That doesn’t even seem so unreasonable. Is that the limit though? My cable puts a gigabyte a second down it so I wouldn’t imagine that would hit the limit.

      • @GeniusIsme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        It is trivial arithmetic: 4.52403840*2160 ≈ 9 GB/ s. Not even close. Even worse, that cable will struggle to get ordinary 60hz 4k delivered.

        • @pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          4.5 × 240 × 3840 × 2160 ≈ 9 GB/s

          It seems markdown formatting ruined your numbers because of the asterisks. Whatever is written between two of those turns italic, so they’re not ideal for multiplication symbols here on Lemmy (or any other place that implements markdown formatting).

        • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I think the maths got a bit funky there. I don’t think a cable capable of such speeds would struggled to do 60Hz at 4K, it surely doesn’t need close to a gigabyte a second?

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        USB-C with Thunderbolt currently had a limit of 40Gbit/sec. Wikipedia has a table of what DisplayPort can do at that bandwidth:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

        See the section “Resolution and refresh frequency limits”. The table there shows it’d be able to do 4k/144hz/10bpp just fine, but can’t keep above 60hz for 8k.

        Its an uncompressed video signal, and that takes a lot of bandwidth. Though there is a simple lossless compression mode.