@kinther@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 4 months agoStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.comexternal-linkmessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up1603
arrow-up1603external-linkStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.com@kinther@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 4 months agomessage-square260fedilink
minus-square@catloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish17•4 months agoCould someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
minus-square@GlitterInfection@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish16•4 months agoThat would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
minus-squarestrawberrylinkfedilink5•4 months agoI mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
minus-square@assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•4 months agoI mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
Could someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
That would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
I mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing
not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
I mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.