• FumpyAer [any, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    376 months ago

    Don’t accept the capitalist premise that it’s normal to compromise safety for expediency and cheapness.

    Also, you can reuse some of that engineering through a full line of cars.

    • macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      huh? I’m not making a value judgement, I’m saying that as a matter of fact capitalists have compromised safety for expediency and cheapness. It’s not because of techbros fucking around or something.

      Reuse is possible, but only to a limited degree. Setting up tooling is very expensive. Not as bad as body panels which are custom per model, but still pretty rough. You’ll see that when you look at the cost of buying replacement parts for even a parts bin GM car. Gauge cluster, button and dial assemblies, the interior trim that the buttons and dials go in, all surprisingly expensive when you think of how much tablet you could buy for the same money. There is a real profit motive behind the screens. Even in consumer/hobby electronics, my background, it’s the same: cases and buttons often dominate BOM costs (and require manual assembly).